Contradictions

What’s really interesting in development (or not) of bilingualism in the U.S. is who should be educated in dual language programs, what purpose they serve, and when should they begin/end. A number of studies demonstrate that children in dual language programs do well in these programs, they don’t fall behind children who are placed in immersion programs, and they even show some advantages on some testing. An added benefit I’ve read about (but, I don’t have data at hand) is that students who were ELLs are less likely to drop out of school if they attended a dual-language program. That’s a great benefit to our society as a whole.

Some school districts have noticed these kinds of advantages and as a result are adding dual-language education at the upper grades.  Blaine County School District is one of those programs. Wow! They’ve seen that these kids really benefit from dual-language education and this is seen in high test scores.

With knowledge of benefits of bilingualism for competition in a world market college students often take foreign language courses. Often the study of a foreign language starts in high school, but often not before. Children however can be bilingual and can thrive in such environments. I don’t know why we as a society are so frightened of populations who speak other languages. But, we should really see this as a resource and build dual-language programs from a young age in which English only speakers can learn another language, and children who speak other languages can learn English.

Which brings me to the contradiction, in San Jose, CA a popular dual-language program is closing citing budget problems. My question is how is closing the program going to solve the budget shortfall? The children served by the program still have to be educated, even if not in two languages. For those who are English language learners and for those who will wait till college to learn another language will there be a greater cost?

About these ads

, , , ,

  1. #1 by The Unapologetic Polyglot on March 27, 2009 - 9:05 pm

    I’m so frustrated to hear about districts closing the door on an effective dual language program. The reality is that dual language programs are no more expensive than English programs, and in fact they end up saving money in the long term because they save costs that might have been accrued for remediation if students fell behind in English programs. Educators and advocacy organizations have to stand up and not permit budget cuts to affect our bilingual programs.

  2. #2 by Gina on April 29, 2009 - 5:03 pm

    Elizabeth,
    I am a communication sciences and disorders major at Penn State and I just wanted to comment on your site. I am current taking a Public Speaking Class, and I have chosen to write my three speeches on teaching children L2s much sooner, in kindergarten to be exact. Your site has helped me out a lot with my research & information gathering.
    I wanted to leave you a comment showing my support for your site, and your dedication towards bilingualism. I also wanted to share my frustration about the dual-language program shutting down as well. That is the exact opposite action that should be taken in the fields of language.
    Thank you for all of your hard work and commitment towards bilingualism and language.
    -Regina

  1. Unfortunately, Lots of People Pay Attention to Ignorant Comments « 2 Languages 2 Worlds

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,493 other followers

%d bloggers like this: